Our research uses A/B testing of diverse (social, native, mobile, video, addressable TV, zone TV, etc.) digital options on top of the national layer of brand TV as it exists.
It is anticipated that some of the A/B tests will include bold options such as social-dominant digital allocation, native-dominant, mobile-dominant, etc.
Questions to be addressed include:
-What is the optimal form of digital/advanced platform advertising/native to use synergistically with traditional TV?
-How does this differ by product vertical (CPG, Auto, Rx, Tune-in, Other)?
-How does this differ by brands in the same vertical?
-Are there so many variables that each brand has to continually test for optimal digital/advanced mix because new creative or other factors could change the optimal digital mix?
Review the Audience Measurement program and register.
Member Only Access
AI is transforming how organizations generate insights and forecast outcomes, but questions remain about reliability and the need for human oversight. On September 14-15 in NYC, industry and academic leaders gathered to discuss integrating AI into analytics workflows and maintaining transparency.
Member Only Access
This MSI working paper introduces TextBO, a novel AI framework designed to improve marketing decisions more efficiently by minimizing costly evaluation cycles. By combining large language models with Bayesian optimization principles, the approach enables AI systems to iteratively refine outputs—such as ad creatives—while requiring fewer real-world tests. The result: faster learning, better-performing outcomes, and a more scalable path to AI-driven decision-making.
Member Only Access
Companies run many marketing experiments, but most A/B tests are analyzed independently—limiting what firms can learn about how customers respond to interventions over time. This research introduces a hierarchical Bayesian framework that integrates data from many experiments simultaneously to estimate customer-level responsiveness to marketing. Using large-scale field experiments, the model decomposes treatment effects into customer, campaign and timing components and uses these insights to improve targeting decisions. The results show that most variation in marketing effectiveness comes from persistent differences in customer responsiveness, enabling firms to better identify who to target and when.
Member Only Access