How much impact can a single word have in a marketing message? A new study introduces a cutting-edge causal inference framework using language models to quantify the exact influence of words—such as “you” or “thank you”—on consumer engagement. The findings show that traditional A/B tests often miss these nuanced effects, while this new method isolates true word-level causal impacts, with big implications for advertising and fundraising success.
Member Only Access
In the rapidly evolving digital content landscape, media firms and news publishers require automated and efficient methods to enhance user engagement. This study introduces the LLM-Assisted Online Learning Algorithm (LOLA), a novel framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with adaptive experimentation to optimize content delivery. Leveraging a large-scale dataset from Upworthy, which includes 17,681 headline A/B tests, the study investigates three pure-LLM approaches and finds that prompt-based methods perform poorly, while embedding-based classification models and fine-tuned open-source LLMs achieve higher accuracy.
LOLA combines the best pure-LLM approach with the Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) algorithm to allocate traffic and maximize clicks adaptively. Numerical experiments on data from the website Upworthy show that LOLA outperforms the standard A/B test method, pure bandit algorithms and pure-LLM approaches, particularly in scenarios with limited experimental traffic. This scalable approach is applicable to content experiments across various settings where firms seek to optimize user engagement, including digital advertising and social media recommendations.
Member Only Access
Our research uses A/B testing of diverse (social, native, mobile, video, addressable TV, zone TV, etc.) digital options on top of the national layer of brand TV as it exists.
It is anticipated that some of the A/B tests will include bold options such as social-dominant digital allocation, native-dominant, mobile-dominant, etc.
Questions to be addressed include:
-What is the optimal form of digital/advanced platform advertising/native to use synergistically with traditional TV?
-How does this differ by product vertical (CPG, Auto, Rx, Tune-in, Other)?
-How does this differ by brands in the same vertical?
-Are there so many variables that each brand has to continually test for optimal digital/advanced mix because new creative or other factors could change the optimal digital mix?
Review the Audience Measurement program and register.
Member Only Access
Our research uses A/B testing of diverse (social, native, mobile, video, addressable TV, zone TV, etc.) digital options on top of the national layer of brand TV as it exists.
It is anticipated that some of the A/B tests will include bold options such as social-dominant digital allocation, native-dominant, mobile-dominant, etc.
Questions to be addressed include:
-What is the optimal form of digital/advanced platform advertising/native to use synergistically with traditional TV?
-How does this differ by product vertical (CPG, Auto, Rx, Tune-in, Other)?
-How does this differ by brands in the same vertical?
-Are there so many variables that each brand has to continually test for optimal digital/advanced mix because new creative or other factors could change the optimal digital mix?
Review the Audience Measurement program and register.
Member Only Access