ARF the Advertising Research Foundation
  • Membership
  • Research
  • Access Knowledge
  • Communities
  • Events
  • About the ARF

home

Membership

  • Committees & Boards
  • Events
  • Self Service Research
  • Member Bulletin Board

Research

  • Recent ARF Research
  • Programs & Resources
  • Research Focus Topics
  • ARF DASH: Annual TV Universe Study

Access Knowledge

  • Topics
    • Ad Effectiveness & ROI
    • Analytics & Data Science
    • Audience & Media Measurement
    • Creative & Branded Content
    • Past Event Highlights
    • Research & Data Quality
    • Targets & Segments
  • Find a Solution
    • 2024 Top Member Questions
  • Publications
    • News You Can Use
    • Knowledge at Hand
    • Journal of Advertising Research
    • CMO Briefs

Events

  • Upcoming ARF Events
    • View All Upcoming Events
    • Upcoming Conferences
    • Upcoming Young Pros
  • Insights Studios
    • Upcoming Insights Studios
    • Past Insights Studios
  • Town Halls
    • Upcoming Town Halls
    • Past Town Halls
  • Past Event Highlights
  • Submit

Communities

  • Young Pros
    • About Young Pros
    • Upcoming Events
    • Advisory Board
    • Young Pros Spotlight
    • Social Strategist Team
    • Past Events Highlights
  • Women in Analytics
    • About Women in Analytics
    • Board of Directors
    • Mentorship Program
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events Summaries
  • Councils
    • Learn About the Council Program
    • ANALYTICS COUNCIL
    • MSI/ARF B2B Exchange
    • CREATIVE COUNCIL
    • COGNITION COUNCIL
    • CROSS-PLATFORM COUNCIL
    • CULTURAL-EFFECTIVENESS COUNCIL
    • LA MEDIA RESEARCH COUNCIL
    • ORGANIZATIONAL COUNCIL
    • PHARMA COUNCIL
    • SHOPPER INSIGHTS COUNCIL
    • SOCIAL COUNCIL

About ARF

  • About the ARF
  • ARF Board of Directors & Trustees
  • ARF Leadership Team
  • Marketing Science Institute (MSI)
  • Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM)
  • Member Directory
  • ARF Awards
  • ARF In the Press
  • Press Kit
  • Contact Us
  • NYU/ARF Certificate in Marketing Optimization & Insights Certificate
  • ARF WIDE
  • ARF DASH: Annual TV Universe Study

My Account

  • Login
  • Create an Account

Invalid login. Please try again.

Password does not meet the required minimum length of 7.

JAR masthead
Current Issue Summary
December 2021 (Vol. 61, Issue 4)

Effects of Animation and Rotoscoping in Direct-to-Consumer Rx TV Advertising: How Animation vs. Rotoscoping vs. Live Action Drive Perceptions and Attitudes toward Drugs
Brands have used animated characters in ads for low-involvement products like food. But more recently, this format has appeared in direct-to-consumer TV commercials promoting prescription drugs. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is charged with ensuring that people understand the risks and benefits of these drugs. Its observation—about the increased use of the animation format—led to this study exploring whether the animation or rotoscoping tactic in ads “inflates efficacy perceptions, minimizes risk, or otherwise hinders comprehension of drug risks and benefits.” The research team—Amie C. O’Donoghue and Kevin R. Betts (both at the FDA), Sarah Parvanta (ALS Association; previously at RTI International), and Mihaela Johnson, Bridget Kelly and Nicole Mack (all three at RTI International)— offer insights into these ads’ effectiveness.

In experiments, the researchers tested fictitious ads for drugs that treat dry eye and psoriasis against a convenience sample of nearly 1,000 participants (divided by about half for each product category). They examined whether animation or rotoscoping could affect the processing of information differently than with ads featuring live human actors, and whether that impact varied by medical condition. They also tested for recall, comprehension, perceived benefit and risk, attitudes and behavioral intentions. Drawing from the uncanny valley theory, the researchers expected the eeriness of rotoscoped characters to “evoke discord in the viewer and a sense of revulsion.” Such aversive reactions “may inhibit recall and cause negative feelings.” But, bucking earlier research, the type of character did not affect memory at all. “Neither retention of risk nor retention of benefit information was affected by character manipulation.”

Among the findings:

  • Animation or rotoscoping had no effect on comprehension of drug risks or benefits, the perception of them or behavioral intentions surrounding them.
  • Animated ads resulted in “more negative attitudes toward the character, ad and product.”
  • On some occasions, rotoscoped ads also produced less-positive attitudes than the live-action ones. But future research should explore lagged effects of recall, given the possibility that ads “featuring animated characters are recalled over time better than those with live-action or rotoscoped characters because of the less positive attitudes they induce.”
LogIn to Access
  • About JAR/Article Access Tips
  • Get Articles
  • Current Issue Summaries
  • Back Issue Summaries
  • Submit an Article
  • Meet the Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • JAR Insights Studio Series
  • JAR Webinars
  • JAR Inside the Research Podcasts

CURRENT ISSUE

  • Cover

    JUNE 2025
  • ABOUT
  • ARF DASH
  • ARF WIDE
  • ARF/NYU CERTIFICATE
  • CIMM
  • MSI
  • PRESS
  • SUBMIT
image description

To further, through research, the scientific
practice of advertising and marketing

© the Advertising Research Foundation. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Request Permission to Use Content