ARF the Advertising Research Foundation
  • Membership
  • Research
  • Access Knowledge
  • Communities
  • Events
  • About the ARF

home

Membership

  • Committees & Boards
  • Events
  • Self Service Research
  • Member Bulletin Board

Research

  • Recent ARF Research
  • Programs & Resources
  • Research Focus Topics
  • ARF DASH: Annual TV Universe Study

Access Knowledge

  • Topics
    • Ad Effectiveness & ROI
    • Analytics & Data Science
    • Audience & Media Measurement
    • Creative & Branded Content
    • Future States & AI
    • Past Event Highlights
    • Research & Data Quality
    • Targets & Segments
  • Find a Solution
    • 2025 Top Member Questions
  • Publications
    • News You Can Use
    • March 2026: Journal of Advertising Research
    • Knowledge at Hand
    • CMO Briefs

Events

  • Upcoming ARF Events
    • View All Upcoming Events
    • Upcoming Conferences
    • Upcoming Young Pros
  • Insights Studios
    • Upcoming Insights Studios
    • Past Insights Studios
  • Town Halls
    • Upcoming Town Halls
    • Past Town Halls
  • Past Event Highlights
  • Submit

Communities

  • Young Pros
    • About Young Pros
    • Upcoming Events
    • Advisory Board
    • Young Pros Spotlight
    • Social Strategist Team
    • Past Events Highlights
  • Women in Analytics
    • About Women in Analytics
    • Board of Directors
    • Mentorship Program
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events Summaries
  • Councils
    • Learn About the Council Program
    • ANALYTICS COUNCIL
    • MSI/ARF B2B Exchange
    • CREATIVE COUNCIL
    • COGNITION COUNCIL
    • CROSS-PLATFORM COUNCIL
    • CULTURAL-EFFECTIVENESS COUNCIL
    • LA MEDIA RESEARCH COUNCIL
    • ORGANIZATIONAL COUNCIL
    • PHARMA COUNCIL
    • SHOPPER INSIGHTS COUNCIL
    • SOCIAL COUNCIL

About ARF

  • About the ARF
  • ARF Board of Directors & Trustees
  • ARF Leadership Team
  • ARF at 90
  • Marketing Science Institute (MSI)
  • Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM)
  • Member Directory
  • ARF Awards
  • Press Kit
  • ARF in the Press
  • Contact Us
  • NYU/ARF Certificate in Marketing Optimization & Insights Certificate
  • ARF WIDE
  • ARF DASH: Annual TV Universe Study

My Account

  • Login
  • Create an Account

Invalid login. Please try again.

Password does not meet the required minimum length of 7.

JAR masthead
Current Issue Summary
June 2023 (Vol. 64, Issue 2)

A Comparison of Social Media Influencers’ KPI Patterns across Platforms: Exploring Differences in Followers and Engagement on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Twitter
How can brands ensure that the social media influencers they choose as marketing partners are effective? This analysis of specific KPIs (followers and engagement), of 180 influencers across five social media platforms, identifies patterns that marketers can use toward establishing partnerships with influencers. The findings by Naser Pourazad (Flinders University), Lara Stocchi (UniSABusiness/University of South Australia) and Shreya Narsey (University of South Australia) can help fine-tune methods in this area which have, to date, been unreliable.

Pourazad, Stocchi and Narsey used a sample of more than 35,000 posts by 180 influencers on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok and Twitter. They describe in their analysis differences in double jeopardy effects observed among mature, growing and changing social media platforms. Moreover, the results hold true across varied areas of the influencers’ expertise, such as beauty and fashion, entertainment and travel, and lifestyle. Among the findings:

  • In the case of mature platforms such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, there is a reverse double jeopardy effect. In other words, “influencers with more followers have a lower engagement rate than influencers with fewer followers.”
  • For growing platforms, such as TikTok, there is a classic double jeopardy effect: “Influencers with more followers have a higher engagement rate than influencers with fewer followers.”
  • For platforms experiencing changes, like Instagram, (e.g. loss of active users due to growth of competing platforms like TikTok), the researchers found “no apparent trade-off between the number of followers and engagement rate of influencers.”

Managers have tended to rely on “unfounded assumptions,” such as that partnering with popular (mega-) influencers is best, due to their “individual qualities and high number of followers,” the authors note. However, micro-influencers can “be generally more effective when the objective is to improve engagement with followers, particularly for Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.” This conclusion “can give brands confidence to work with micro-influencers on Facebook, YouTube and Twitter while being mindful of the effectiveness of influencers with larger follower bases on TikTok. Such a strategy could prove to be cost-effective and, at the same time, achieve the marketing goal.”

Read the full article here.

  • About JAR/Article Access Tips
  • Get Articles
  • Current Issue Summaries
  • Back Issue Summaries
  • Submit an Article
  • Meet the Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • JAR Insights Studio Series
  • JAR Webinars
  • JAR Inside the Research Podcasts

CURRENT ISSUE

  • Cover

    MARCH 2026
  • ABOUT
  • ARF DASH
  • ARF WIDE
  • ARF/NYU CERTIFICATE
  • CIMM
  • MSI
  • PRESS
  • SUBMIT
image description

To further, through research, the scientific
practice of advertising and marketing

© the Advertising Research Foundation. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Request Permission to Use Content