Despite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only AccessDespite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only Access
Despite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only Access
Despite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only Access
Despite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only AccessDespite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only AccessDespite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only AccessDespite a significant amount of research focusing on optimal frequency and recency, stemming back to the 1960’s, there is very little consensus on how many exposures/impressions are “too many” across platforms. Indeed, a blank frequency cap is likely to lead to inefficiencies. The bottom line, there is no simple “rule of thumb” for optimal frequency planning. Read more.
Member Only Access