ARF the Advertising Research Foundation
  • Membership
  • Research
  • Access Knowledge
  • Communities
  • Events
  • About the ARF

home

Membership

  • Committees & Boards
  • Events
  • Self Service Research
  • Member Bulletin Board

Research

  • Recent ARF Research
  • Programs & Resources
  • Research Focus Topics
  • ARF DASH: Annual TV Universe Study

Access Knowledge

  • Topics
    • Ad Effectiveness & ROI
    • Analytics & Data Science
    • Audience & Media Measurement
    • Creative & Branded Content
    • Past Event Highlights
    • Research & Data Quality
    • Targets & Segments
  • Find a Solution
    • 2023 Top Member Questions
  • Publications
    • News You Can Use
    • Knowledge at Hand
    • Journal of Advertising Research
    • CMO Briefs

Events

  • Upcoming ARF Events
    • View All Upcoming Events
    • Upcoming Conferences
    • Upcoming Young Pros
  • Insights Studios
    • Upcoming Insights Studios
    • Past Insights Studios
  • Town Halls
    • Upcoming Town Halls
    • Past Town Halls
  • Past Event Highlights
  • Submit

Communities

  • Young Pros
    • About Young Pros
    • Upcoming Events
    • Advisory Board
    • Young Pros Spotlight
    • Social Strategist Team
    • Past Events Highlights
  • Women in Analytics
    • About Women in Analytics
    • Board of Directors
    • Mentorship Program
    • Upcoming Events
    • Past Events Summaries
  • Councils
    • Learn About the Council Program
    • ANALYTICS COUNCIL
    • MSI/ARF B2B Exchange
    • CREATIVE COUNCIL
    • COGNITION COUNCIL
    • CROSS-PLATFORM COUNCIL
    • CULTURAL-EFFECTIVENESS COUNCIL
    • LA MEDIA RESEARCH COUNCIL
    • ORGANIZATIONAL COUNCIL
    • PHARMA COUNCIL
    • SHOPPER INSIGHTS COUNCIL
    • SOCIAL COUNCIL

About ARF

  • About the ARF
  • ARF Board of Directors & Trustees
  • ARF Leadership Team
  • Marketing Science Institute (MSI)
  • Coalition for Innovative Media Measurement (CIMM)
  • Member Directory
  • ARF Awards
  • ARF In the Press
  • Press Kit
  • Contact Us
  • NYU/ARF Certificate in Marketing Optimization & Insights Certificate
  • ARF WIDE
  • ARF DASH: Annual TV Universe Study

My Account

  • Login
  • Create an Account

Invalid login. Please try again.

Password does not meet the required minimum length of 7.

JAR masthead
Current Issue Summary
March 2021 (Vol. 61, Issue 1)

Updating the Foote, Cone & Belding grid: Revisiting the Product Classifications of the FCB Grid for Online Shopping and Contemporary Consumers’ Decision Making
Named for the agency where it originated in 1980—the FBC grid is one of the most popular product-classification schemes in advertising and consumer research. Advertising professionals and researchers use the grid for determining ad campaign messages and for theoretical background. But, according to Hyuk Jun Cheong (Akita International University-Japan) and Yunjae Cheong (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies-South Korea), the FCB grid no longer reflects current-day products and consumers’ online purchase decisions. An overhaul is clearly overdue—not only to weed out obsolete product types like “TV consoles” and dated product references like “salad oil”—but to make structural changes based on today’s marketplace behaviors, preferences and purchase decisions. The updates, in fact, reinforce creative strategies that some big advertisers, like P&G and Unilever, have adopted already, combining both rational and emotional appeals even for low-involvement products.

The researchers surveyed 1,104 U.S. consumers to measure their levels of purchase-decision involvement against different product types. Participants also reported on the “think-feel” aspects of their decisions: whether or not the purchase was logical and objective, whether it was based on functionality versus feeling, and whether they preferred to make purchases or search for products online or offline.

Among the outcomes:

  • Expanding the grid from four purchase decision quadrants to eight.
  • Dividing the product types on the basis of shopping contexts—online, offline or both—that consumers generally engage in when buying a specific type of product.
  • Replacing obsolete products with new ones, like smart TVs.
  • Practitioners should not depend on the myth that consumers consider products exclusively through emotional values (e.g., design, colors, a brand’s sign values) or functional benefits (e.g., durability). Consumers may find products’ emotional and functional considerations almost equally important and evaluate them simultaneously.

Read the full article here.

 

  • About JAR/Article Access Tips
  • Get Articles
  • Current Issue Summaries
  • Back Issue Summaries
  • Submit an Article
  • Meet the Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • JAR Insights Studio Series
  • JAR Webinars
  • JAR Inside the Research Podcasts

CURRENT ISSUE

  • Cover

    MARCH 2025
  • ABOUT
  • ARF DASH
  • ARF WIDE
  • ARF/NYU CERTIFICATE
  • CIMM
  • MSI
  • PRESS
  • SUBMIT
image description

To further, through research, the scientific
practice of advertising and marketing

© the Advertising Research Foundation. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy | Request Permission to Use Content