attention

MODERATED TRACK DISCUSSIONS: Attention Measures: What Counts & How Much Does it Cost

Jane Clarke (CIMM) followed up with each of this session’s presenters on the goals and data points of their discrete studies. The following are edited highlights from the discussions.

  • A necessity condition is that consumers have to pay attention to advertising for advertising to initiate any kind of sequence, according to Shuba (Boston University). To the extent that consumers pay attention to ads, only then is any kind of advertising effect through a hierarchical sequence triggered, so it’s a necessary condition but it’s not sufficient to say which of these intermediate factors would have the effect on sales. Not all of these metrics drive sales equally – know the sequence for your brand and advertisers.
  • Gen Z and Millennials consumed more content overall, but still had a higher rate of aided recall than other generations (Gen X, Boomers), shared Heather (Snap). Last year, they conducted a research study with Kantar to evaluate the information processing power across different generations to see if there were any differences. Each generation used Snap as they normally would, and they controlled for ad exposure. What they learned is that younger participants showed superior ad processing power when looking at ad message recall. This is surprising because we may be underestimating what we expect from the younger generations.
  • Advertisers are getting better at creating 6-second ads. According to Kara (Magna Global), back when they first started building :06 second ads, it was simply taking your :15 or :30 second ad and cutting it down to :06 seconds. You were really at the mercy at what had already been shot for another purpose. Cutting the original down to :06 seconds and maintaining branding and storytelling was very difficult to do. Now advertisers are creating :06 second ads – either on a custom basis or shooting with :06 second ad in mind, knowing that the longer versions will be cut down. Overall, that’s led to more efficient short ads because they’ve learned with the right material and testing what is going to work in a shorter amount of time.
  • The historical econometric model approach won’t garner the most accurate view of cross-platform reach or delivery, noted Heather. From this research they were able to provide a different way of thinking. A :06 second ad isn’t half as effective as a :12 second ad, and a :12 second ad isn’t a frequency of 2 to a :06 sec ad – that kind of thinking doesn’t hold true any longer. They saw that there were other kinds of descriptors, like platform, device, attention – those can and should be used to better equivalize impressions across platforms. She hopes this research challenges the industry’s way of thinking.
  • A new tool called the Attention Calculator was just launched by TVision and Lumen. Yan (TVision) explained that this tool was based on their study and it’s for anyone interested in attention for media planning and duration based metrics. It’s a free and interactive tool that calculates the cost of attention with the user’s CPMs to see the average cost per impression across platforms, based on Ebiquity data.

Advertising’s Sequence of Effects on Consumer Mindset and Sales

The academic study at the heart of this presentation compared 13 hierarchy-of-effects (HoE) advertising models to determine which model matters the most, what moderators are most prominent, and what factors and sequence are most important in driving sales. Understanding the sequence of effects is most important for advertisers and marketers as they build their campaigns.

Does Every Second Count?

Kara Manatt (Magna) and Heather O’Shea (Snap) presented research that compared :06 second and :15 second ad lengths across three video platforms – Snap, video aggregators, and full episode players (FEPs) – to determine the optimum ad length for an effective ad strategy.

 

In testing the same :06 and :15 ads for the same four brands, the study factored in the characteristics of each platform – pre-roll/mid-roll, skippable and non-skippable, and device – as it tracked 7,500+ panelists’ viewing behaviors for brand awareness, brand perception, and purchase intent.

Understanding the True Cost of Attention Across Media

Lumen Research and TVision came together with Ebiquity to study differences in the way advertising generates visual attention across varied media and how much it costs to buy that attention. By combining their individual datasets – Lumen’s visual attention to digital advertising on desktop and smartphones, TVision’s TV attention data, and Ebiquity’s cost data – the researchers devised a new currency, the aCPM, a proxy metric representing the cost per thousand seconds of attention.

Conversations with Great Minds: Great Mind Awards 2022

Conversations with Great Minds gathered two of the 2022 Great Mind Award winners, Martin Renaud, winner of the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) Award, and Dr. Duane Varan, winner of the Erwin Ephron Demystification Award, for one-on-one interviews that profile their individual approaches to effective research in advertising.

Concurrent Track Panel Discussions: ART & SCIENCE IN AD CREATIVE

MSI’s Earl Taylor moderated a panel discussion regarding art and science in ad creative. The diverse panel of industry leaders provided feedback, commentary and viewpoints on a variety of topics presented on day two of AUDIENCExSCIENCE 2022. Areas of discussion included category disruption, ad currency, drivers of interactive video, opportunities from disruption and ad length effectiveness.

THE LAST WORD

Julia Johnston (Comscore) moderated the closing remarks with panelists Edwin Wong (Vox Media), Josh Chasin (VideoAmp), and Cole Strain (Samba TV). The group offered differing perspectives on the panels presented on day two of AUDIENCExSCIENCE 2022. Some topics of discussion included effective ad length and appropriate platforms, quality of measurement, the industry’s openness to new standards and the emerging team approach to problem-solving.

What is the Value of Time in Advertising?

This panel built on research and discussions at two ARF Town Halls about the quality of ad impressions on different platforms. Two issues were highlighted: measurement challenges and assessing the value of time spent with and of attention to advertising.