What do Consumers Really Think?
Accurately measuring consumers’ beliefs and attitudes is more complex and difficult than we assume, according to several new books on misinformation and beliefs. Read more »
Accurately measuring consumers’ beliefs and attitudes is more complex and difficult than we assume, according to several new books on misinformation and beliefs. Read more »
Manuel Garcia-Garcia, Ph.D. – Global Lead of Neuroscience, Ipsos
Ariane Pol – Global Head of Research for Creative Works, Google
Geraldine Rodriguez – Client Manager Applied Research, Ipsos
Can YouTube help drive long-term brand building? How do you measure long-term brand building? When brands want to air strategic long-term campaigns, they typically revert to traditional media. Most people are not in need of a brand’s immediate offering, but they represent the biggest sales opportunity. Ten years ago, the IPA demonstrated that campaigns whose primary focus was emotional were the most effective. Emotions are the fuel that allow high conversion over time. Brands should tap into emotions of consumers that may not be interested in a product now but may be relevant in the future. Ipsos partnered with Google Creative Works to study the observed and declared behaviors. Methodology: A triangulation of methods were used. They were Creative/Spark (market validated KPIs of creative impact); Ipsos Bayesian Nets (models the impact of emotion); Ipsos Emotion Framework (captures emotional responses). Ipsos Emotion Framework defines emotions as physiological changes we experience in response to the environment. These are complex emotions that are heavily driven by culture and context, and they are therefore, not universal. This complicates measuring emotions. While emotions are not universal, we can explain emotions based on valence, arousal and control. This maintains the cultural authenticity but can be compared across cultures. The experimental approach to measuring long-term brand growth included a brand relationship index (BRI), comprised of brand performance = how would you rate [brand] in terms of what you are looking for in a [category] + brand closeness = how close do you feel to [brand]? Findings:Pedro Almeida – CEO, MediaProbe
Context matters—not all reach is equal, and so, we need a way to qualify each impression and valuate each of these impressions. Metric of valuation needs to be valid, reliable and have predictive power for business outcomes. The research focus: 1) What can we say about the value of emotional engagement (EE)? 2) Can we model the value of EE via its impact on memory? 3) Can we use EE to optimize and valuate content and ad positions? How? Methodology: MediaProbe used Galvanic Skin Response with participants who were exposed to content through a MediaProbe panel (U.S., 2,700 households). Data gets delivered second by second and data extracted goes toward creating an impact measure of how much people are reacting to what they are watching. The platform calculates an impact value that enables comparisons across media platforms. There was an added layer to see whether participants are leaning into the content and are engaged. U.S. TV dataset includes over 45,000 participants, reaching over 85,000 hours. More than 1,000 TV hours are monitored and over 42,500 ads. Using a subset of 16,351 ads and 329 “premium pod” formats, participants watch content and are then asked which ads they remember. Findings:Bill Harvey – Executive Chairman, Bill Harvey Consulting
Elizabeth Johnson, Ph.D. – Executive Director & Senior Fellow, Wharton Neuroscience Initiative, UPenn
Michael Platt, Ph.D. – Director, Wharton Neuroscience Initiative, UPenn
Audrey Steele – EVP Sales Research Insights & Strategy, FOX Corp.
The presenters discussed their study focused on the link between attention and sales. Attention is required for engagement. Eyes on screen do not predict sales well. However, three main brain measurement dimensions account for sales and branding effects: brand attraction/joy (=motivational signals in fMRI and EEG), memory (=Theta power in EEG) and synchrony (=collective resonance across audience brains, in fMRI and EEG)—all require more than 1-2 seconds to unfold and measure. Using neuroanalysis can help unmask hidden thoughts and feelings (via fMRI). Additionally, scaled up, other predictive bio and neuro metrics can be just as predictive. The research shows that patterns of brain activity predict sales best: the sum of all perceptual, attentional, emotional, social and memory processes. We can also use EEG to tell us about frustration, attention, memory, sleep/introspection. Research using EEG shows that EEG measuring brand attraction/joy can predict 80% variance in sales. Notably, brand attraction/joy takes 15 seconds to peak. Brain memory also predicts sales. Notably, memory encoding picks up after 10 seconds. Finally, synchrony—collective audience response—predicts more than 90% of sales but also has temporal dynamics, peaks at 5 seconds and picks up again after 15-20 seconds. Wharton Neuroscience investigated predicting how different content and platform impact sales lift. The study design: eight ads in eight verticals tested in each of the 10 experimental cells (7 TV, 2 smart phones, 1 control condition). Four ads at a time are shown between TV show. Each viewer will only see one kind of content. Findings from the 3% of total sample: attraction and memory are sustained for ads shown in premium channels compared to YouTube. Value of context is enormous! YouTube has a drop at 4 seconds whereas TV continues. Key takeaways:Pedro Almeida – CEO, MediaProbe
Pierre Bouvard – Chief Insights Officer, Cumulus Media | Westwood One
The presentation focused on determining the emotional impact of AM/FM radio ads. MediaProbe was retained by Cumulus Media to measure second-by-second electrodermal activity (EDA)—a measure of the sympathetic nervous system, to see when it is activated, whether listeners were excited by the stimulus they heard. This is termed Emotional Impact Score (EIS)—an impact metric that can help understand how excited people are on a second-by-second basis and what are the elements that drive this emotion. This is an objective way of quantifying emotion in media and advertising content, capturing the emotional implicit data (what people feel). Throughout the session, participants can also dial those moments that they like/dislike—the conscious explicit capture of likes and dislikes, and are asked pre and post session questions to learn more about recall and purchase intent. Methodology: 36 AM/FM radio ads, in a simulated broadcast of 30 minutes across four genres (urban, news, adult contemporary and rock/oldies). Each “broadcast” had three ad breaks and the average commercial break had three ads. Also, 227 people participated. Each “broadcast” had a sample size of 75 people and consumers listened to at least three of the four broadcasts. Each ad was exposed to 225 people. Findings:At this Insights Studio, researchers in Europe, the U.K. and the U.S. presented work in relatively new fields that have high-impact potential for the advertising industry. Starting with a forthcoming paper on sonic branding, the authors described their ground-breaking framework for measuring the implicit effects of sonic branding using music to manipulate visual scenes in video, film and TV. Next, a deep dive into autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR)—a sensory-inducing device in ads—included strategies for helping brands collaborate with successful ASMR influencers. Lastly, a preview of an article to be published in the March Prosocial Advertising Special Issue showed how brand activism influences attitudes and purchase intentions, revealing a credibility gap between established activist brands and brands emerging in that space. Taking questions from Paul and from attendees, panelists in the concluding Q&A explored links between sonic branding and ASMR, the demographics of ASMR followers, ways for emergent activist brands to close the credibility gap with established activist brands, and future research possibilities.
Member Only AccessOn January 23, Ken Roberts, Founder and President of Forethought™, Mary Wilson Avant, Senior Consultant of Forethought™ and Elizabeth Windram, EVP, Marketing & Communications of CLEAR discussed the seven answers every CMO should demand, ranging from predicting change in market share, creating internal alignment between marketing and the rest of the organization, how generative AI can be leveraged, and more. Currently this content is only available to event attendees.
Member Only AccessCover images—the preview images that provide a glimpse of the content to be shown in pre-roll video ads—can determine whether or not someone clicks on the ad, depending on the level of arousal in those images and how well it meets their sensational needs, new research shows.
Member Only AccessThe media landscape continues to evolve, arguably at a faster rate than ever. Leading media and measurement experts presented research-based insights on how viewers use different forms of TV/video on various platforms. Attendees joined us at the Warner Bros. Discovery Studios in California and via livestream to understand the latest data and discussions of the data’s implications.
Member Only AccessAt our second annual Creative Effectiveness event, industry visionaries discussed the perspectives, theories, and resources they employ to develop and measure great creative. Attendees joined us in New York City or via livestream to hear fresh insights on the advertising landscape: from using AI as a stimulus for creative to extracting behavioral data and using that to try and inspire creative. Immediately after, we honored the teams behind insights-driven advertising with the ARF David Ogilvy Awards ceremony and dinner. The Gold, Silver and Bronze winners were announced, as well as the reveal of this year’s prestigious Grand Ogilvy Award recipient.
Member Only Access