News You Can Use

A weekly round-up of the industry’s top stories and research curated by the ARF.

The Social Media Report: MPA Association of Magazine Media

Click to see a series of charts/tables/infographics from the Magazine Media Industry. Examples include Top 25 Magazine Brands—Likes/Followers, and Top 10 Magazine Brands—Likes/Followers by Social Network. Data shown are collected from about 230 magazine media brands from 36 companies. Analyses include Facebook Page Likes, Twitter Followers, Instagram Followers, Pinterest Followers. Also included: 3 Things to Know: Social Video.

Magazine Media 360˚ Social Media Report. MPA Association of Magazine Media.

Jim Anderson, CEO, SocialFlow. 3 Things to Know: Social Video. MPA Association of Magazine Media.

Consumers May Be More Trusting of Ads Than Marketers Think

A study done by Professors Kent Grayson (Northwestern) and Mathew Isaac (Seattle University) surveyed 400 participants regarding 20 common tactics used in television and digital ads. Thirteen of the tactics elicited favorable responses, which surprised even marketers.

Grayson said, “People have said, ‘I don’t trust advertising.’ The truth is, there is a lot of advertising that they do trust.”

Certain tactics, such as offering to match a competitor’s low prices, or mentioning a recent ranking by a third-party source, received the most positive reactions from participants. Others, like using paid actors instead of real people, or even hiring celebrity endorsers to express their affinity for a product, came off as “deceptive” or “manipulative,” according to those surveyed.

An important point, Isaac said, is that consumer disbelief about certain tactics can also be fluid. Some approaches deemed disreputable a few years ago could become more widely accepted. Product placements and native advertising—packaged to look like journalism—are two examples.

Zach Schonbrun. Consumers May Be More Trusting of Ads Than Marketers Think. The New York Times.

Marketers Struggle to Adapt

Based on a poll of 150 marketers—conducted with HH Global, a procurement and creative-production solutions provider—the CMO Council discovered that firms are finding it hard to localize content and tailor their output for individual media platforms.

Only 36% of interviewees, for instance, agreed they were performing “well” or “extremely well” when it comes to translating creative strategies across all the necessary physical and digital touchpoints.

Similarly, just 32% believed they are currently “doing well” or are “very advanced” in adapting branded content for the “markets, audiences, partners, and geographies” served by their companies around the world.

Resolving these issues is a “critical challenge” for brand custodians aiming to truly meet evolving shopper needs in the markets they play in.

“Increasingly discerning consumers expect—if not demand—that the materials brands present across sales, marketing, and service touchpoints are timely, relevant, and reflect the customer’s unique context,” the study said.

Marketers Struggle to Adapt. WARC.

Gotlieb Says Failure to Build Brands Is Hurting the Economy

Every client, Irwin Gotlieb (Global Chairman of GroupM) said, is suffering from what his boss, WPP’s Martin Sorrell, coined as “short-termism.” Every client has to make the next quarterly report. “When you become more focused on the short term than the long term, you need to narrow your marketing funnel because that’s where long-term effect happens. You focus on short-term ROI, and brand building doesn’t give you short-term return, it gives you long-term return.”

What Gotlieb really misses, he said a little wistfully, is the “deep client relationships that we had, that evolved over decades of working together. Today, that’s more the exception than the rule, and I think the work suffers as a consequence.”

Irwin explained why WPP originally put all its media holdings in one nest. He said the elements of media, data, and technology all benefit significantly from scale, and the creative function really doesn’t.

He maintains that, “It’s really easy to save money by downgrading the quality of the media that you acquire. The CPMs go down, the GRPs remain the same, and the client saves money. But it doesn’t always have the same effectiveness, and it doesn’t always have the same outcomes. We believe that our role is to help guide a client to optimize their profits, not to save money on media expenditures.”

Rance Crain. Failure to Build Brands Is Hurting the Economy, GroupM’s Irwin Gotlieb Says. AdvertisingAge.

P&G Cuts Up to $140 million in digital advertising

Procter & Gamble reported that it cut approximately $100 million to $140 million in digital advertising spend last quarter because of brand safety concerns and ineffective ads. The CPG company also cut agency and production money.

P&G said digital ad spending fell because of choices to “temporarily restrict spending in digital forums where our ads were not being placed according to our standards and specifications.”

For all of marketers’ moaning about the perennial problems of the online advertising ecosystem—bots, fraud, ad tech tax, viewability, measurement—spend on digital ads keeps going up and up. But Procter & Gamble is one advertiser that has been protesting those issues with its budget.

Lara O’ Reilly. P&G Cuts $100 Million of “Ineffective” Digital Ads. Wall Street Journal

Jack Neff. P&G Slashes Digital Ads by $140M Over Brand Safety. Sales Rise Anyway. AdvertisingAge

Lauren Johnson. Procter & Gamble Cuts Up to $140 Million in Digital Ad Spending Because of Brand Safety Concerns. Adweek.

Cause-Related Ads Increase Fourfold

Purpose-driven ads are not only growing in number, but they generate more views and drive more results in the form of engagement rates, research shows.

Drawing on YouTube data, the video ad tech company Pixability established that cause-related ads among the Interbrand 2016 list of top 100 global brands had increased fourfold over the past five years.

And while they were tackling a wide variety of issues, some were more prominent than others—notably women’s empowerment, which accounted for 24% of purpose-driven videos from the top 100 brands. Other topics addressed included community aid (17%), adversity (16%), sustainability (14%), and equality (10%); healthy living made up only 4% of the total.

The average number of views for such purpose-driven videos was almost 1 million more than for non-purpose ones. And the engagement rate, calculated by Pixability as the sum of likes, dislikes, comments, and Facebook shares, was higher compared with 0.29% for non-purpose ads.

Cause Related Ads Increase Fourfold. WARC.

Why the U.S. Ad Industry Will Never Regulate Gender Stereotypes

The British regulatory body Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) made headlines around the world, by announcing its plans to take “a tougher line” on “ads that mock people for not conforming to gender stereotypes,” in order to better serve the public. The ASA does not have the power to outright ban offending ads as it primarily investigates consumer complaints, but it can publicly recommend that certain campaigns be pulled. Most U.K. media companies follow its guidelines.

Debates over gender stereotypes are nothing new in the American ad industry, but R/GA SVP of Strategy and Partnerships Jessica Greenwood believes that this sort of state-sanctioned smackdown on sexist spots will never happen in the United States. 

Agencies and brands “need to be more intentional with our creative, casting and storytelling decisions,” said Lynn Power, CEO at JWT in New York. “[That will] go some way to change our collective unconscious bias.”  

At Cannes Lions in June, JWT unveiled research which found that men appear in ads four times more often than women, and Unilever announced that it had partnered with UN Women to get stereotypes out of its advertising.

Kristina Monllos. Why the US Ad Industry Will Never Regulate Gender Stereotypes. Adweek.

Kristina Monllos. Men Appear in Ads 4 Time More Than Women, According to Research Revealed at Cannes. Adweek.

Aline Santos. Gender is changing. So must advertising. Cannes Lions.

NFL Puts Fans in Lab to See What Works as Football Seeks Answers

If you notice more split-screens and fewer commercial breaks on NFL broadcasts this coming season, credit the fans who served as football’s lab rats.

Last fall, just as TV ratings went into a tailspin, the National Football League (NFL) invited fans into a lab designed like a living room. Technicians asked them to watch games, tracking their eye movement, heart rates and skin response. They saw different ad formats, including split screens with commercials on one side and the field on the other.

Tod Leiweke, the NFL’s chief operating officer, said, “We’re going into people’s homes and replicating the game experience and trying to watch everything from what their eyes are following to what their behavior is during commercials breaks.”

The tests — which were planned prior to last season and were the most extensive ever by the league — are contributing to big changes in how games will be broadcast when the regular season starts.  

One big change is a cut in the number of commercial breaks — to four per quarter from five. They’ll be longer so the networks can still sell the same number of commercials but less frequent. There will be 30 percent fewer promotional messages.

Gerry Smith. NFL Puts Fans in Lab to See What Works as Football Seeks Answers. Bloomberg.

Publishers Forge Ahead with VR, Even if Users and Advertisers Lag Behind

Advertising on VR is still just the domain of a few blue-chip advertisers. Most advertisers are so new to the medium and don’t have VR-ready ads, and most publishers are new to making VR ad content themselves, so the path to monetization is far from clear. Kelly Andresen, of USA Today’s branded content studio, said. “People don’t have the language or knowledge of how to buy it.”

Some publishers are focusing on 360 or augmented reality video instead because it’s less expensive than VR, doesn’t require a headset and advertiser demand already exists. 

When it comes to virtual reality, few publishers are as committed as The New York Times, with its dedicated VR app and Daily 360 feature, helped by funding from tech giants Samsung and Google. USA Today is entering its second season of its weekly VR show, “VRtually There,” which has explored extreme sports and nature, after racking up 10 million views in season one last fall, on no fewer than seven platforms.

But outside those two publishers and a handful of others, there’s less to crow about. VR is still test-and-learn territory for most publishers.

Lucia Moses. Publishers forge ahead with VR, even if users and advertisers lag behind. Digiday.

Hashtags Disappear from TV Commercials

The past five years have also seen the rise and fall of marketers using hashtags to drive calls to action. In 2012, under 2% of national TV ads used a hashtag to drive consumer interactions, according to the iSpot.tv research. Hashtags quickly became more prevalent, hitting their peak in TV commercials in the fourth quarter of 2014, when 8% of national ads included them. There was Charmin’s #TweetFromTheSeat campaign, in 2014, which urged consumers to send tweets from the toilet. Doritos’ #CrashTheSuperBowl. Coca-Cola’s #ShareACoke.

In 2015, according to iSpot.tv CEO Sean Muller, call-to-action hashtags began falling out of TV commercials. By January 2016, they appeared in 3% of national spots. Now they’re under 2% again. “I think advertisers have gotten smarter about driving consumers to their own properties, where they have the direct relationship, as opposed to driving it to a third-party website,” Muller said.

Will Jarvis. Hashtags’ Boon in TV Commercials is Over.  Ad Age.